Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 December 20213277103

16 Newberries Avenue, RADLETT, WD7 7EW

conversion of loft to habitable room with side and rear dormers and front and side rooflights

Authority
Hertsmere Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Troy D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and the area

What decided it

The scale, siting and design of the proposed dormer extensions and roof alterations would result in incongruous and out-of-keeping additions causing unacceptable harm to the host property and the area, conflicting with development plan policies and NPPF design principles.

The benefits of high quality design and additional accommodation were given some weight but were insufficient to outweigh the identified harm to character and appearance; the moderate weight accorded to the fallback position under permitted development rights did not alter this conclusion.

Framework references: 126, 130

Plan policies cited: Policy CS22 of the Hertsmere Local Plan Development Plan Document Core Strategy 2013, Policy SADM30 of the Site Allocations and Development Management Policies Plan 2016, Part E of the Council's Planning and Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document 2006

Judgments cited: Mansell v Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council [2017] EWCA Civ 1314

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.