Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 June 20223277168

Bourneside Bagshot Road, Chobham, Woking, Surrey, GU24 8SJ

Planning appeal 3277168 at Bourneside Bagshot Road, Chobham, Woking, Surrey, GU24 8SJ (Surrey Heath Borough Council) was dismissed on 27 June 2022 by Inspector Szymanski D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

Conversion of existing garage/storage building including a first floor flat to a three-bedroom dwelling including erection of rear extension following demolition of existing swimming pool and enclosure building, summer house and games room outbuilding

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Szymanski D
Postcode
GU24 8SJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development upon the setting and significance of Bourneside as a Grade II Listed Building
  • whether condition 8 is reasonable and necessary

What decided it

Condition 8 is necessary to secure the beneficial effects to Green Belt openness and character that outweigh the heritage harm, and without it the development could result in harmful effects that would alter the balance justifying the scheme.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP1Policy DM1Policy DM9Policy CP14
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 137Paragraph 147Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 195Paragraph 199Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

101 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Surrey Heath Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed18 September 20266012106
    2 Killy Hill, Chobham, GU24 8RF
  2. Allowed21 May 20266002295
    Land At Snows Ride, Windlesham, Surrey, GU20 6LA
  3. Dismissed1 May 20263376162
    Langshot Equestrian Centre, Gracious Pond Road, Chobham, Woking, GU24 8HJ
  4. Allowed17 April 20263374712
    Newlyn, Highams Lane, Chobham, Surrey, GU24 8TD
  5. Dismissed30 March 20263374826
    Land to the West of 35 Mincing Lane, Chobham, Woking, Surrey, GU24 8RS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.