Planning appeal decision
54 Sir Richards Drive, BIRMINGHAM, B17 8SS
a Loft Conversion
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Sutton A
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the dwelling and the surrounding area
What decided it
The proposed roof extension would significantly protrude above neighbouring roof ridges, disrupting the consistent roof line and appearing as an incongruous and dominating feature that would be harmful to the character and appearance of the dwelling and surrounding area.
Plan policies cited: Policy PG3 of the Birmingham Development Plan, Paragraph 3.14C–D of the Birmingham Unitary Development Plan
Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL, 1982, P37]
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®