Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 December 20213277202

54 Sir Richards Drive, BIRMINGHAM, B17 8SS

a Loft Conversion

Authority
Birmingham City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Sutton A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the dwelling and the surrounding area

What decided it

The proposed roof extension would significantly protrude above neighbouring roof ridges, disrupting the consistent roof line and appearing as an incongruous and dominating feature that would be harmful to the character and appearance of the dwelling and surrounding area.

Plan policies cited: Policy PG3 of the Birmingham Development Plan, Paragraph 3.14C–D of the Birmingham Unitary Development Plan

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL, 1982, P37]

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.