Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 March 20223277226

119 Charville Lane, HAYES, UB4 8PD

Proposed demolition of detached garage building; Demolition of main roof over dwelling and extension to form first floor and second floor with side and rear dormers; rooflights to main roof at front and side; Proposed Single and two storey rear and side extension with rooflight’s to lean to roof; Insulating, rendering and painting white external elevations and Demolition of existing railings and gates and proposed brick wall Flank and Front with piers with wrought iron railings and gates to front boundary

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Walker R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed front boundary treatment on the character and appearance of the area
  • if it is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal would constitute disproportionate development in the Green Belt, transforming the modest dormer bungalow into a large two-storey dwelling, and no very special circumstances were demonstrated to outweigh this harm.

Framework references: 149

Plan policies cited: Policy G2 of the London Plan (2021), Policy EM2 of the Council's Local Plan: Part One - Strategic Policies (2012), Policy DMEI4 of the Council's Local Plan: Part Two – Development Management Policies (2020), Policies BE1 and EM2 of the LP1, Policies DMHB11, DMHB12, DMHD1 and DMEI4 of the LP2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.