Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 December 20213277314

Tinkerdale, Brookhouse, Laughton, Sheffield, S25 1YA

Planning appeal 3277314 at Tinkerdale, Brookhouse, Laughton, Sheffield, S25 1YA (Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 7 December 2021 by Inspector Cragg D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policy.

raising the roof to create a two storey dwelling with a first floor rear extension, the insertion of dormer windows into the front and rear elevati ons, the demolition of existing rear conservatory and erection of single storey rear and side extension

Authority
Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Cragg D
Postcode
S25 1YA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policy
  • the effect on the openness and the purposes of the Green Belt
  • if the proposal is inappropriate, would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The cumulative volume increase of 171% substantially exceeds the 33% disproportionality threshold in Policy SP4, making the proposal inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no very special circumstances to justify it.

The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, which attracts substantial weight, was not clearly outweighed by the limited social benefits and neutral considerations, so very special circumstances do not exist.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS4Policy SP4Policy SP2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

18 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rotherham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266011173
    Green Acres, Moat Lane, Wickersley, S66 1DZ
  2. Dismissed5 June 20266004041
    Land South, Of 83 Newhill Road Battison Lane, Rotherham, S63 6LN
  3. Dismissed9 February 20266001358
    8 Grange Gardens, Todwick, Rotherham, S26 1JR
  4. Dismissed30 September 20253371423
    5 Turnshaw Road, Ulley, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, S26 3YG
  5. Allowed30 September 20253371303
    Lynncroft Bungalow, Hard Lane, Kiveton Park, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, S26 6RP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.