Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld13 June 20223277359

95 Clapham Common South Side, LONDON, SW4 9DN

Without planning permission, the unauthorised insertion of grey aluminium framed bifold doors to the rear first floor elevation of the premises leading onto a rear roof terrace enclosed by unauthorised metal balustrades (‘the unauthorised metal bi-fold doors and balustrade’)

Authority
London Borough of Lambeth
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Gray E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the steps required to comply with the enforcement notice are excessive (ground (f) appeal)

What decided it

The steps required by the enforcement notice to remove the unauthorised bifold doors and balustrade and reinstate the rear elevation are not excessive, as they seek to return the site to its condition prior to the breach of planning control, and any lesser alternatives would constitute materially different schemes requiring separate planning applications.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.