Planning appeal decision
Land South Of High Lane (North/West Of A690), Stoneygate, Newbottle, Houghton Le Spring, Sunderland City Borough, DH4 4NH
Planning appeal 3277375 at Land South Of High Lane (North/West Of A690), Stoneygate, Newbottle, Houghton Le Spring, Sunderland City Borough, DH4 4NH (Sunderland City Council) was dismissed on 16 November 2021 by Inspector Cragg D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the relevant development plan policies and the Framework.
equestrian use of land, formation of horse track through partial re-levelling, fencing, and planting
- Authority
- Sunderland City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Change of use
- Inspector
- Cragg D
- Postcode
- DH4 4NH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the relevant development plan policies and the Framework
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify it
What decided it
The moderate harm to Green Belt openness and countryside encroachment, given substantial weight, is not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits of outdoor sport and recreation, so very special circumstances do not exist.
The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and limited harm to character and appearance weigh heavily against the proposal and are not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits to outdoor sport and recreation, resulting in dismissal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy NE6Policy NE9Policy BH1Policy VC6Policy NE8
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 147Paragraph 149Paragraph 150
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Sunderland
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed10 September 202660106442 Crowther Road, Crowther, Washington, NE38 0AA
- Dismissed9 July 20266006595Filebase Limited, Filebase House, 3A Stephenson Road, Stephenson, Washington, NE37 3HW
- Dismissed8 June 20266003972Ferry Farm House, Offerton Lane, Sunderland, SR4 0NH
- Dismissed18 December 20253368870Land South of The Paddock , West Herrington, Houghton-le-Spring, DH4 4NR
- Dismissed31 October 20253365311Land at Usworth House Farm, Peareth Hall Road, Springwell, Gateshead, NE9 7NT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®