Burstow Bridge Cottage, Church Lane, Burstow, Horley, Surrey, RH6 9TG

Planning appeal 3277427 at Burstow Bridge Cottage, Church Lane, Burstow, Horley, Surrey, RH6 9TG (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 24 November 2021 by Inspector Thomas N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the two outbuildings are permitted development under Class E of Schedule 2 Part 1 of the GPDO as buildings incidental to the enjoyment of the dwellinghouse.

Erection of two outbuildings (garage/store building and summerhouse/garden room)

Authority: Tandridge District Council
Appeal type: ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: other · Householder developments
Inspector: Thomas N
Postcode: RH6 9TG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

Whether the two outbuildings are permitted development under Class E of Schedule 2 Part 1 of the GPDO as buildings incidental to the enjoyment of the dwellinghouse

What decided it

The appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate on the balance of probabilities that the buildings, given their substantial size relative to the modest bungalow, were genuinely and reasonably required for purposes incidental to the enjoyment of the dwellinghouse.

What the Inspector cited

Judgments: Emin v SSE & Mid Sussex DC [1989] JPL 909; Wallington v SSW & Montgomeryshire DC [1990] JPL 112; Wallington v SSW & Montgomeryshire DC [1991] JPL; Holding v FSS & Thurrock BC [2004] JPL 1405; Croydon LBC v Gladden [1994] 1 PLR 30; Peche d'Or Investments v SSE & another [1996] JPL 311

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

77 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Tandridge District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

Allowed29 October 20266006369
Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
Dismissed26 October 20266014139
31a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
Dismissed15 October 20266005184
Streathbourne House, 75 Redehall Road, Smallfield, RH6 9QA
Dismissed14 October 20266008351
Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
Dismissed13 October 20266007518
Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.