®Planning appeal decision
Burstow Bridge Cottage, Church Lane, Burstow, Horley, Surrey, RH6 9TG
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Thomas N
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the two outbuildings are permitted development under Class E of Schedule 2 Part 1 of the GPDO as buildings incidental to the enjoyment of the dwellinghouse
What decided it
The appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate on the balance of probabilities that the buildings, given their substantial size relative to the modest bungalow, were genuinely and reasonably required for purposes incidental to the enjoyment of the dwellinghouse.
Judgments cited: Emin v SSE & Mid Sussex DC [1989] JPL 909; Wallington v SSW & Montgomeryshire DC [1990] JPL 112; Wallington v SSW & Montgomeryshire DC [1991] JPL; Holding v FSS & Thurrock BC [2004] JPL 1405; Croydon LBC v Gladden [1994] 1 PLR 30; Peche d'Or Investments v SSE & another [1996] JPL 311
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.