Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 March 20223277479

Norsted Manor, Norsted Lane, Orpington, Kent, BR6 7PB

the replacement of existing garage and equipment/ machinery store with new building of equivalent floor area

Authority
London Borough of Bromley
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Glassar S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, and if so whether this would amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposed building would be materially larger than the existing building it would replace, constituting inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and the limited weight given to the appellant's justifications did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt.

Framework references: 137, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy 49

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.