Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 March 20223277747

3 Grove Cottages Bedmond Hill, Pimlico, HEMEL HEMPSTEAD, HP3 8SQ

construction of 2 semi-detached dwellings

Authority
Three Rivers District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Gould G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including any effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the development on the living conditions for its occupiers, with particular regard to outdoor space provision
  • whether the development would make adequate provision for on-site parking and vehicle manoeuvring
  • whether the development would make adequate provision for affordable housing
  • if the development would be inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, combined with substantial harm to character and appearance, living conditions, and highway safety, was not clearly outweighed by the modest benefit of providing two dwellings in a context of housing land supply shortfall, such that very special circumstances did not exist.

the benefits of providing two dwellings in an area with a two-year housing land supply did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt, character and appearance, living conditions of occupiers, and highway safety, and the moderate harm from inadequate affordable housing provision

Framework references: 11, 12, 13, 30, 64, 130, 137, 147, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy CP1, Policy CP4, Policy CP10, Policy CP11, Policy CP12, Policy DM1, Policy DM2, Policy DM13

Judgments cited: Julian Wood v the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195; R.(on the application of Tate) v Northumberland County Council v Susan Leffers-Smith [2018] EWCA Civ 1519

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.