Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 March 20223277747

3 Grove Cottages Bedmond Hill, Pimlico, Hemel Hempstead, HP3 8SQ

Planning appeal 3277747 at 3 Grove Cottages Bedmond Hill, Pimlico, Hemel Hempstead, HP3 8SQ (Three Rivers District Council) was dismissed on 16 March 2022 by Inspector Gould G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including any effect on the openness of the Green Belt.

construction of 2 semi-detached dwellings

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Gould G
Postcode
HP3 8SQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including any effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the development on the living conditions for its occupiers, with particular regard to outdoor space provision
  • whether the development would make adequate provision for on-site parking and vehicle manoeuvring
  • whether the development would make adequate provision for affordable housing
  • if the development would be inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, combined with substantial harm to character and appearance, living conditions, and highway safety, was not clearly outweighed by the modest benefit of providing two dwellings in a context of housing land supply shortfall, such that very special circumstances did not exist.

the benefits of providing two dwellings in an area with a two-year housing land supply did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt, character and appearance, living conditions of occupiers, and highway safety, and the moderate harm from inadequate affordable housing provision

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP1Policy CP4Policy CP10Policy CP11Policy CP12Policy DM1Policy DM2Policy DM13
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 12Paragraph 13Paragraph 30Paragraph 64Paragraph 130Paragraph 137Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149
Judgments
Julian Wood v the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195; R.(on the application of Tate) v Northumberland County Council v Susan Leffers-Smith [2018] EWCA Civ 1519

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

30 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Three Rivers

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed12 October 20266002930
    Land to the Rear of, 76 and 78 Church Lane, Sarratt, WD3 6HL
  2. Allowed24 September 20266010198
    Rusper, Nottingham Road, Heronsgate, WD3 5DN
  3. Dismissed12 August 20266006827
    Land Adjacent to Sarratt Lane, Loudwater, WD3 4AS
  4. Dismissed30 June 20266004957
    Land Adjoining Westwood End, Bucks Hill, Kings Langley, WD4 9AS
  5. Dismissed17 June 20266005833
    8 Moneyhill Parade Uxbridge Road, Rickmansworth, WD3 7BE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.