Planning appeal decision
3 Grove Cottages Bedmond Hill, Pimlico, Hemel Hempstead, HP3 8SQ
Planning appeal 3277747 at 3 Grove Cottages Bedmond Hill, Pimlico, Hemel Hempstead, HP3 8SQ (Three Rivers District Council) was dismissed on 16 March 2022 by Inspector Gould G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including any effect on the openness of the Green Belt.
construction of 2 semi-detached dwellings
- Authority
- Three Rivers District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Gould G
- Postcode
- HP3 8SQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including any effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the development on the living conditions for its occupiers, with particular regard to outdoor space provision
- whether the development would make adequate provision for on-site parking and vehicle manoeuvring
- whether the development would make adequate provision for affordable housing
- if the development would be inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, combined with substantial harm to character and appearance, living conditions, and highway safety, was not clearly outweighed by the modest benefit of providing two dwellings in a context of housing land supply shortfall, such that very special circumstances did not exist.
the benefits of providing two dwellings in an area with a two-year housing land supply did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt, character and appearance, living conditions of occupiers, and highway safety, and the moderate harm from inadequate affordable housing provision
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP1Policy CP4Policy CP10Policy CP11Policy CP12Policy DM1Policy DM2Policy DM13
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 12Paragraph 13Paragraph 30Paragraph 64Paragraph 130Paragraph 137Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149
- Judgments
- Julian Wood v the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195; R.(on the application of Tate) v Northumberland County Council v Susan Leffers-Smith [2018] EWCA Civ 1519
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Three Rivers
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed12 October 20266002930Land to the Rear of, 76 and 78 Church Lane, Sarratt, WD3 6HL
- Allowed24 September 20266010198Rusper, Nottingham Road, Heronsgate, WD3 5DN
- Dismissed12 August 20266006827Land Adjacent to Sarratt Lane, Loudwater, WD3 4AS
- Dismissed30 June 20266004957Land Adjoining Westwood End, Bucks Hill, Kings Langley, WD4 9AS
- Dismissed17 June 202660058338 Moneyhill Parade Uxbridge Road, Rickmansworth, WD3 7BE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®