Planning appeal decision
3 Grove Cottages Bedmond Hill, Pimlico, HEMEL HEMPSTEAD, HP3 8SQ
construction of 2 semi-detached dwellings
- Authority
- Three Rivers District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Gould G
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including any effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the development on the living conditions for its occupiers, with particular regard to outdoor space provision
- whether the development would make adequate provision for on-site parking and vehicle manoeuvring
- whether the development would make adequate provision for affordable housing
- if the development would be inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, combined with substantial harm to character and appearance, living conditions, and highway safety, was not clearly outweighed by the modest benefit of providing two dwellings in a context of housing land supply shortfall, such that very special circumstances did not exist.
the benefits of providing two dwellings in an area with a two-year housing land supply did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt, character and appearance, living conditions of occupiers, and highway safety, and the moderate harm from inadequate affordable housing provision
Framework references: 11, 12, 13, 30, 64, 130, 137, 147, 148, 149
Plan policies cited: Policy CP1, Policy CP4, Policy CP10, Policy CP11, Policy CP12, Policy DM1, Policy DM2, Policy DM13
Judgments cited: Julian Wood v the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195; R.(on the application of Tate) v Northumberland County Council v Susan Leffers-Smith [2018] EWCA Civ 1519
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®