Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 January 20223277768

Shirburn Road, Watlington, OX49 5BZ

Planning appeal 3277768 at Shirburn Road, Watlington, OX49 5BZ (South Oxfordshire District Council) was dismissed on 11 January 2022 by Inspector Blackwell J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would secure an acceptable provision of affordable housing in terms of distribution, design and tenure.

the redevelopment of part of the site on Shirburn Road to create a new block of 34 affordable apartments for people aged 55 and over

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Blackwell J
Postcode
OX49 5BZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would secure an acceptable provision of affordable housing in terms of distribution, design and tenure
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the wider development site, with particular regard to layout, design and levels of outdoor amenity space
  • whether the proposal would secure the infrastructure necessary to meet the needs of the wider development

What decided it

The proposal would conflict with Policy H9 of the Local Plan in terms of distribution, design and tenure of affordable housing across the whole development site, and this harm would not be outweighed by any benefits including the additional 4 affordable units over policy requirement or the secured infrastructure contributions.

the harm arising from substantial and extensive conflicts with affordable housing policy would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefit of 4 additional affordable units over policy requirement, even if the Council could not demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H9Policy SA1Policy DES1Policy H2Policy D1Policy INF1Policy EP3Policy C2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11
Judgments
Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

12 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Oxfordshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266013107
    Charleston, Bolney Road, Lower Shiplake, RG9 3NS
  2. Dismissed29 October 20266005561
    4 Spring Path, Thame, OX9 2EF
  3. Allowed26 October 20266011152
    Luffield House, 85A Wallingford Road, Goring, RG8 0HL
  4. Dismissed7 October 20266007830
    Land off Wyfold Lane, Peppard Common, RG9 5LR
  5. Allowed7 October 20266005521
    Land Rear of The Paddocks, Lower Icknield Way, Chinnor, OX39 4GR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.