Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld9 March 20233277844

5 Oaklands Avenue, ISLEWORTH, TW7 5PX

without planning permission, (1) the erection of a hip to gable rear roof dormer and the insertion of three roof lights; (2) the installation of UPVC (plastic) windows to the principal elevation of the house and the replacement of roof tiles to the house

Authority
London Borough of Hounslow
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Moore D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appellant has shown that the enforcement notice was not served as required by Section 172 of the 1990 Act and there has been substantial prejudice (ground e)
  • Whether the matters alleged do not constitute a breach of planning control (ground c)
  • Whether the matters alleged were substantially completed four or more years prior to the issue of the notice (ground d)
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area, in particular the Osterley Park Conservation Area (ground a)
  • Whether the steps required by the notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control (ground f)
  • Whether the period for compliance with the notice is reasonable (ground g)

What decided it

The mismatch of materials—large profiled concrete roof tiles and dark grey plastic windows—creates an incongruous appearance in the street scene that adversely affects the significance of the Osterley Park Conservation Area with no substantiated public benefits to outweigh the harm.

Plan policies cited: Policy CC1, Policy CC2, Policy CC4, Policy SC7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.