Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 December 20213277856

10 Rothbury Road, LIVERPOOL, L14 4AD

to erect a two storey side extension

Authority
Liverpool City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Wraight G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of 1 Berryford Road

What decided it

The use of a gable roof on the proposed extension would form a visually incongruous feature at odds with the prevailing hipped roof design in the area, causing significant harm to character and appearance that outweighed the appellant's personal reasons for the extension.

The significant harm to character and appearance caused by the gable roof design outweighed the appellant's reasons for wishing to extend the dwelling.

Plan policies cited: Saved Policy HD18 of the Unitary Development Plan 2002, Saved Policy H8 of the Unitary Development Plan 2002, Policy H8 of the Liverpool Local Plan 2013-2033, Policy UD1 of the Liverpool Local Plan 2013-2033

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.