Planning appeal decision
52 Brighton Crescent, BRISTOL, BS3 3PR
erection of a detached single dwelling and associated works
- Authority
- Bristol City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Ford C
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- whether suitable provision would be made for cycle parking
What decided it
The unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area caused by the contrived sunken appearance and split-level character of the proposed dwelling, combined with the failure to provide suitable cycle parking, outweighed the limited housing and economic benefits when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.
The harm to character and appearance and failure to support sustainable transport significantly and demonstrably outweighed the very limited benefits of providing a single market dwelling in a sustainable location, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.
Framework references: 11, 219
Plan policies cited: Policy BCS21, Policy BCS10, Policy DM21, Policy DM23, Policy DM26, Policy DM27, Policy DM28, Policy DM29
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®