Second Meadow Stables, Brent Eleigh Road, Lavenham, Sudbury, CO10 9PE

Planning appeal 3277936 at Second Meadow Stables, Brent Eleigh Road, Lavenham, Sudbury, CO10 9PE (Babergh District Council) was dismissed on 27 May 2022 by Inspector Simpson L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The principle of the proposed development with specific regard to its location, including the accessibility of the site to services and facilities.

described on the application form as ‘The proposal seeks planning permission for the current Mobile Home to be replaced with modest permanent living accommodation’

Authority: Babergh District Council
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector: Simpson L
Postcode: CO10 9PE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

The principle of the proposed development with specific regard to its location, including the accessibility of the site to services and facilities
The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the appeal site and surrounding area, including the Special Landscape Area
The effect of the proposed development on highway safety

What decided it

The appeal site's poor accessibility to services and facilities due to lack of footways on the main road and reliance on private motor vehicles, combined with the absence of a proven justifiable need for the development, caused substantial harm that outweighed the moderate benefits of increased housing stock and improved accommodation.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Core Strategy Policy CS2Core Strategy Policy CS11Core Strategy Policy CS15Lavenham Neighbourhood Plan Policy H1Saved Local Plan Policy CR04
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 80Paragraph 80aParagraph 111

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

18 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Babergh District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

Allowed7 October 20266011354
Land at Junction of Friars Street and Church Street, Sudbury, CO10 2AJ
Allowed16 September 20266013583
57 Vale View Road, Sproughton, Ipswich, IP8 3FS
Dismissed16 September 20266011384
34 Aldham Road, Hadleigh, IP7 6BP
Allowed7 August 20266007359
Oaks Farm, Hadleigh Road, Holton St Mary, CO7 6NW
Dismissed5 August 20266005638
Land East of Capel Road, Bentley, IP9 2DN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.