Little Meadow, Halliloo Valley Road, Woldingham, Caterham, CR3 7HP

Planning appeal 3278162 at Little Meadow, Halliloo Valley Road, Woldingham, Caterham, CR3 7HP (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 22 March 2022 by Inspector Davies N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies and the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt.

erection of a new carport

Authority: Tandridge District Council
Appeal type: householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Householder developments
Inspector: Davies N
Postcode: CR3 7HP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies and the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
Whether harm by reason of inappropriateness would be clearly outweighed by other considerations and if so whether those amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing harm to openness and rural character, and the benefits identified did not clearly outweigh this harm to constitute very special circumstances.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy DP10Policy DP13Policy DP14Policy CSP18

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

101 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Tandridge District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

Allowed29 October 20266006369
Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
Dismissed14 October 20266008351
Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
Dismissed13 October 20266007518
Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
Dismissed23 September 20266008688
Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
Dismissed22 September 20266011736
Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.