®Planning appeal decision
Land East of the Hollies, Moneyrow Green, Holyport, Maidenhead, SL6 2ND
Planning appeal 3278222 at Land East of the Hollies, Moneyrow Green, Holyport, Maidenhead, SL6 2ND (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 13 December 2021 by Inspector Jones L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Appeal A: Whether the matters alleged have occurred as a matter of fact and whether they constitute a breach of planning control.
without planning permission the erection of a building
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- agricultural · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Jones L
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Appeal A: Whether the matters alleged have occurred as a matter of fact and whether they constitute a breach of planning control
- Appeal B: Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including an assessment of the effect on the openness of the Green Belt; the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area; and if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm, by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The development failed to preserve the openness of the Green Belt, which is an essential characteristic, and caused significant harm to character and appearance that was not clearly outweighed by other considerations.
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and harm to character and appearance was not clearly outweighed by other considerations (improved access, drainage, continued equestrian use); very special circumstances did not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GB1Policy GB2Policy DG1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 150
- Judgments
- Wealden
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed27 October 20266007126Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
- Dismissed21 October 20266009694Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
- Notice upheld24 September 20263353235Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE
- Notice upheld24 September 20263353234Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE
- Notice varied and upheld17 September 202633621832 Aston Mead, Windsor, SL4 5PW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.