Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 January 20223278256

Land at Filands Road/Jenner Lane , Malmesbury, SN16 9JN

Planning appeal 3278256 at Land at Filands Road/Jenner Lane , Malmesbury, SN16 9JN (Wiltshire Council) was dismissed on 5 January 2022 by Inspector Woodwards O, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the obligation still serves a useful purpose (Appeal B).

Appeal A: residential development, associated infrastructure and public open space; Appeal B: application to discharge a planning obligation not to commence development until primary school land is transferred to the Council; Appeal C: residential development and land for a nursery, associated infrastructure and public open space

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Woodwards O
Postcode
SN16 9HZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the obligation still serves a useful purpose (Appeal B)
  • whether or not the proposals would adequately provide for early-years/nursery education facilities, including consideration of alternative sites and facilities (Appeals A and C)
  • the effect of the proposals on biodiversity, with particular regard to hedgerows (Appeals A and C)
  • whether or not the appeals site is an appropriate location for housing, having regard to local and national planning policy and guidance (Appeals A and C)
  • the effect of the proposed developments on the safe and efficient operation of the highway network in the vicinity of the appeals site (Appeals A and C)

What decided it

Whether the proposal secured adequate land for future educational (nursery) use in place of the 2013 primary school safeguarding was decisive: Appeal C secured 0.3ha for a nursery and succeeded, while Appeal A provided no such safeguarding and caused substantial harm, leading to its dismissal.

For Appeal C, the benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing, economic activity and nursery provision significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited harm from the site's location outside the settlement boundary; for Appeal A, the substantial harm from the lack of safeguarded education provision significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery, so the balance tipped against the scheme.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP1Policy CP2Policy CP3Policy CP13Policy CP43Policy CP50Policy CP52Policy CP55Policy CP57Policy CP60Policy CP61Policy CP62Saved Policy H4Saved Policy CF3Policy 11 (Malmesbury Neighbourhood Plan)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 8Paragraph 11Paragraph 124Paragraph 174Paragraph 180

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

21 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wiltshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed30 September 20266007924
    Beehive Cottage, Portway, Salisbury, SP4 6BL
  2. Dismissed30 September 20266007352
    Land to the East of New Road, Melksham, SN12 7QZ
  3. Allowed23 June 20266006895
    Poles Farm, Swallowcliffe, Salisbury, SP3 5NX
  4. Allowed17 June 20266003895
    86-87 Kington St Michael, Kington St Michael, SN14 6HX
  5. Allowed15 June 20263373278
    Land South of Snarlton Farm, Snarlton Lane, Melksham, Wiltshire, SN12 7QP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.