The Paddocks, Mile Flat, Kingswinford, DY6 0AU

Planning appeal 3278322 at The Paddocks, Mile Flat, Kingswinford, DY6 0AU (South Staffordshire District Council) was allowed on 24 November 2021 by Inspector Walmsley R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the openness of the Green Belt and the character and appearance of the area would be harmed.

2no. replacement dwellings without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 20/00406/FUL, dated 22 July 2020

Authority: South Staffordshire District Council
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector: Walmsley R
Postcode: DY6 0AU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

whether the openness of the Green Belt and the character and appearance of the area would be harmed
in the event that allowing development would lead to inappropriate development in the Green Belt, whether any harm by inappropriateness, or any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances which would be necessary to justify the development

What decided it

Condition 9 is not reasonable or necessary to prevent harm from GPDO Classes A, B, C and D, but remains necessary to restrict Class A Part 2 development (gates, walls, fences) which would cause moderate harm to Green Belt openness and rural character.

The moderate harm to Green Belt openness and character from boundary walls and fences under Class A Part 2 was not outweighed by other considerations, necessitating retention of the condition for that class only.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy GB1Policy EQ4Policy EQ11
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 137

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

22 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in South Staffordshire District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

Dismissed21 October 20266012641
The Granary, Lyne Hill Lane, Penkridge, ST19 5NT
Allowed25 September 20266010537
Land to the Rear of 6-12 Long Lane, Newtown, Wolverhampton, WS6 6AU
Dismissed23 September 20266008866
The Paddocks, Bridgnorth Road, Stourton, DY7 6QZ
Dismissed12 August 20266010048
Hilton Colliery Farm Cottage, Red Lane, Essington, WV11 2RD
Dismissed15 July 20266007394
White Lodge, Old Stafford Road, Slade Heath, WV10 7PH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.