Land to the Rear of 48 Church Road, Studham, LU6 2QA

Planning appeal 3278516 at Land to the Rear of 48 Church Road, Studham, LU6 2QA (Central Bedfordshire) was dismissed on 7 March 2022 by Inspector Owen A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies.

erection of two dwellings with associated access, parking and landscaping

Authority: Central Bedfordshire
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector: Owen A
Postcode: LU6 2QA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
the effect of the proposal on openness
is the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, clearly outweighed by other considerations and if so, does this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal fails to constitute limited infilling in a village because the development would appear isolated from neighbouring buildings with no visual connection, and therefore does not substantially fill a gap between other buildings as required by the definition of infill.

the harms to the Green Belt by virtue of inappropriateness and loss of openness were not clearly outweighed by any other considerations, and very special circumstances do not exist

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy SP4Policy HQ1Policy SP2Policy T2Policy T3
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 11Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

17 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Central Bedfordshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

Dismissed15 September 20266007334
Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
Allowed4 September 20266007202
2 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
Dismissed7 August 20266007254
Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
Dismissed10 July 20266005439
263 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, LU3 3PP
Dismissed8 July 20266007697
142 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, Luton, LU3 3PS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.