Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 November 20213278619

57 Rosecroft Gardens, TWICKENHAM, TW2 7PT

ground floor rear extension including roof extension with dormer

Authority
Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Sutton A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the Rosecroft Gardens Conservation Area
  • Whether the proposal would provide satisfactory standards with regards fire safety

What decided it

The great weight attached to the harm caused to the significance of the designated heritage asset outweighed the limited public benefits of improved family accommodation and effective use of land.

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the conservation area, to which great weight must be attached, outweighed the limited public benefits of improved family accommodation and effective use of land.

Framework references: 197, 199

Plan policies cited: LP 1, LP 3, D12

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.