Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 March 20223278785

Land to the rear of 30A Main Street, Cottesmore, Rutland, LE15 7DJ

the erection of 2 detached dwellings

Authority
Rutland County Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
McDonagh C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site would be a suitable location for housing
  • whether the proposed development would provide appropriate accommodation required to meet local housing needs
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to the Cottesmore Conservation Area

What decided it

The substantial harm to character and appearance and the setting of the conservation area, combined with conflict with the spatial strategy and housing mix requirements, significantly and demonstrably outweighs the limited benefit of 2 dwellings to housing supply.

The limited benefits of 2 dwellings and socio-economic gains were significantly outweighed by substantial harm to character and appearance, less than substantial harm to the setting of the conservation area, and conflict with the spatial strategy and housing type requirements, such that the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

Framework references: 11, 202

Plan policies cited: COT H1, COT H8, COT H2, COT E&C1, COT E&C2, COT H4, COT H5, SP6, SP15, SP20, CS3, CS4, CS19, CS22

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.