Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed22 April 20223278812

Flat 4, 66 Hammersmith Grove, London, W6 7HA

the erection of a 1.2m-high glass balustrade to the rear and 1.7m-high translucent glass screens to the sides of the flat roof of the existing back addition at second floor level, in connection with its use as a roof terrace; replacement of existing door and guardrail in the rear roof extension with a new door, and formation of steps leading to the proposed roof terrace to provide access

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Wyborn D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of each development on the character and appearance of the host building and area, having regard to whether the scheme would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Hammersmith Grove Conservation Area
  • the effect of each development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties, with particular regard to any overlooking

What decided it

The small size of the roof terrace, its elevated position with significant separation distance to rear gardens, the screening effect of the side panels, and the similarity to existing views from the Juliet balcony meant that overlooking would not unacceptably increase beyond the existing situation.

Plan policies cited: Policy DC1, Policy DC4, Policy DC8, Policy HO11, Key Principle CAG3, Key Principle HS8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.