Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 January 20223278813

25-36 Fitzjames Avenue, London, W14 0RR

Planning appeal 3278813 at 25-36 Fitzjames Avenue, London, W14 0RR (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 13 January 2022 by Inspector Burnham T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers with particular regard to outlook and enclosure.

Change of use of lower ground floor from basement storage lockers and plant equipment to a residential dwelling (two-bedroom flat), including enlarged and new window openings, courtyard treatment, internal partition demolition and refurbishment, and creation of new cycle storage in 11-24 Fitzjames Avenue

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Burnham T
Postcode
W14 0RR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers with particular regard to outlook and enclosure
  • The effect of the proposal on the availability of car parking within the area and parking stress

What decided it

The absence of any valid mechanism to ensure the proposal would be car parking permit free, resulting in a failure to accord with Policy T4 of the development plan.

The benefit of providing additional housing in a sustainable location was outweighed by the failure to mitigate parking stress in an area with existing parking stress and excellent public transport accessibility.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HO11 of the Hammersmith and Fulham Local Plan (2018)Policy T4 of the Hammersmith and Fulham Local Plan (2018)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 847 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed21 August 20266010167
    15 Galena Road, London, W6 0LT
  2. Dismissed21 August 20266010163
    13 Galena Road, London, W6 0LT
  3. Dismissed21 August 20266009772
    Pavement Outside 297 King Street, Hammersmith, W6 9NH
  4. Dismissed15 June 20266006413
    110-112 Uxbridge Road, London, W12 8LR
  5. Allowed7 May 20266004923
    205 Munster Road, London, SW6 6BX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.