Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 December 20213278877

182, Heaton Road, Bradford, BD9 4RJ

retrospective planning application for replacement of existing shop front and roller shutters

Authority
City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Cullen F

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the North Park Road Conservation Area
  • Whether the proposal would preserve the setting of the Grade II* listed building, Manningham Mills

What decided it

The less than substantial but considerable harm to the significance of the designated heritage assets, unoutweighed by any substantiated public benefits, required dismissal under paragraphs 201 and 202 of the Framework.

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the designated heritage assets was weighed against the public benefits of the proposal; the harm was of considerable importance and weight and was not outweighed by any substantiated public benefits.

Framework references: 199, 200, 201, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy DS3, Policy EN3, Policy SC1(11), Policy DS1, Shopfront Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document 2007 Principle 1, Shopfront Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document 2007 Principle 2, A Shopkeepers Guide to Securing their Premises Supplementary Planning Document 2012 Design Principle 2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.