Planning appeal decision
Offices James Reinman Marine Ltd, The Broadway, Grimstone End, Pakenham, Bury St. Edmunds, Suffolk, IP31 2JG
Full Planning Permission for Erection of Three No Dwellings and Associated Works (Resubmission of Application Ref: DC/19/0514/FUL)
- Authority
- West Suffolk
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Sturgess M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is a suitable location for development having regard to the Policies of the development plan and the settlement strategy
- whether the proposal provides a mechanism for the delivery of affordable housing within the District
What decided it
The proposal conflicts with the development plan settlement strategy by proposing three dwellings in the countryside outside any settlement boundary, exceeding the small-scale housing exception in Policy DM27, and the material considerations advanced do not carry sufficient weight to determine the appeal otherwise than in accordance with the development plan.
The conflict with the development plan policies, which are up to date and consistent with the Framework, was given substantial weight and outweighed the limited weight attributed to the material considerations including brownfield remediation, economic benefits, housing supply contribution and removal of commercial use.
Framework references: 120, 79, 57
Plan policies cited: Policy CS1, Policy CS4, Policy DM5, Policy DM27, Policy RV3
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®