Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 February 20223278937

Offices James Reinman Marine Ltd, The Broadway, Grimstone End, Pakenham, Bury St. Edmunds, Suffolk, IP31 2JG

Planning appeal 3278937 at Offices James Reinman Marine Ltd, The Broadway, Grimstone End, Pakenham, Bury St. Edmunds, Suffolk, IP31 2JG (West Suffolk) was dismissed on 28 February 2022 by Inspector Sturgess M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is a suitable location for development having regard to the Policies of the development plan and the settlement strategy.

Full Planning Permission for Erection of Three No Dwellings and Associated Works (Resubmission of Application Ref: DC/19/0514/FUL)

Authority
West Suffolk
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Sturgess M
Postcode
IP31 2JG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site is a suitable location for development having regard to the Policies of the development plan and the settlement strategy
  • whether the proposal provides a mechanism for the delivery of affordable housing within the District

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with the development plan settlement strategy by proposing three dwellings in the countryside outside any settlement boundary, exceeding the small-scale housing exception in Policy DM27, and the material considerations advanced do not carry sufficient weight to determine the appeal otherwise than in accordance with the development plan.

The conflict with the development plan policies, which are up to date and consistent with the Framework, was given substantial weight and outweighed the limited weight attributed to the material considerations including brownfield remediation, economic benefits, housing supply contribution and removal of commercial use.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS1Policy CS4Policy DM5Policy DM27Policy RV3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 120Paragraph 79Paragraph 57

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

10 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in West Suffolk

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266010190
    103 Westward Deals, Kedington, CB9 7PL
  2. Dismissed15 October 20266009314
    Deraleen, Baileypool Road, Packenham, IP31 2LX
  3. Dismissed2 October 20266009854
    Green Farm, Lower Green, Stoke By Clare, CO10 8HN
  4. Dismissed6 August 20266006691
    Walnut Tree Barn, Thetford Road, Barnham, IP24 2PA
  5. Dismissed5 August 20266008642
    Stagwood, Thetford Road, Brandon, IP270TW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.