Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision17 December 20213279023

33 Dene Street Gardens , Dorking , RH4 2DN

replacement of 8 No. windows with white UPVC sliding sash windows

Authority
Mole Valley District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Pipkin R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Dorking Conservation Area

What decided it

The white uPVC frames would be visually prominent in the streetscene and lack the fine detailing and authentic character of traditional timber sash windows, causing less than substantial harm to the conservation area's significance that is not outweighed by the appellant's private benefits.

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the Dorking Conservation Area through loss of traditional features was not outweighed by the appellant's private benefits of improved energy efficiency, warmth and health, as alternative means were available to achieve these outcomes without loss of the timber windows.

Framework references: 56

Plan policies cited: Policy CS14 of the Mole Valley Core Strategy 2009, Policy ENV122 of the Mole Valley Local Plan 2000, Policy ENV23 of the Mole Valley Local Plan 2000, Policy ENV39 of the Mole Valley Local Plan 2000

Judgments cited: Burroughs Day v Bristol City Council [1996] 1 PLR 78

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.