Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 February 20223279103

Rosewood House Livermere Road, Great Barton, Bury St. Edmunds, IP31 2SB

Planning appeal 3279103 at Rosewood House Livermere Road, Great Barton, Bury St. Edmunds, IP31 2SB (West Suffolk) was dismissed on 3 February 2022 by Inspector Pipe C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect that modifying conditions 3 and 4, reducing the obscure privacy screens to a height of 1.1m would have on the living conditions of occupants of neighbouring properties.

Householder Planning Application - (i) Two Storey Side Extension to Northern Elevation, (ii) Ground Floor Rear and Side Extension to Southern Elevation to Include Roof Terrace, (iii) 1no. Balcony to Rear, (iv) 1no. Veranda to Rear, (v) Alteration of Existing Openings, (vi) Formation of New Openings and (vii) Cladding of Building without complying with conditions attached to planning permission Ref DC/17/1029/HH, dated 21 July 2017

Authority
West Suffolk
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Pipe C
Postcode
IP31 2SB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect that modifying conditions 3 and 4, reducing the obscure privacy screens to a height of 1.1m would have on the living conditions of occupants of neighbouring properties

What decided it

Reducing the obscure privacy screens from 1.7m to 1.1m would allow unrestricted views from the terrace into adjacent private rear amenity spaces, significantly harming the living conditions of neighbouring occupants.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM2Policy DM24

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

11 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in West Suffolk

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266010190
    103 Westward Deals, Kedington, CB9 7PL
  2. Dismissed15 October 20266009314
    Deraleen, Baileypool Road, Packenham, IP31 2LX
  3. Dismissed2 October 20266009854
    Green Farm, Lower Green, Stoke By Clare, CO10 8HN
  4. Dismissed6 August 20266006691
    Walnut Tree Barn, Thetford Road, Barnham, IP24 2PA
  5. Dismissed5 August 20266008642
    Stagwood, Thetford Road, Brandon, IP270TW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.