Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 November 20213279265

93 Summerfield Crescent, BIRMINGHAM, B16 0EN

an installation of roof terrace to rear

Authority
Birmingham City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Sutton A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area
  • The effect on the living conditions of the occupants of 91 and 95 Summerfield Crescent, in respect to privacy

What decided it

The proposal would cause unacceptable harm to both the character and appearance of the dwelling and surrounding area and the privacy of neighbouring occupants at No. 95, with no material considerations outweighing these harms.

No balancing exercise was undertaken; the proposal was found to conflict with the development plan on two grounds with no countervailing benefits of sufficient weight.

Plan policies cited: Policy PG3, Paragraph 3.14C, Paragraph 3.14D, Policy TP27

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.