Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 March 20223279562

2 and 3 London Mews, London, W2 1HY

roof extension to two terraced houses

Authority
City of Westminster Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Willis S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Bayswater Conservation Area
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of nearby properties, with particular regard to outlook, daylight and sunlight

What decided it

The identified less than substantial harm to the conservation area's significance, combined with unacceptable impacts on neighbouring properties' outlook and amenity, outweighed the limited personal benefits of the scheme.

Plan policies cited: Policy 38, Policy 39, Policy 40, Policy 7, Policy 33

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.