®Planning appeal decision
67 Oakleigh Park North, Mill Hill, LONDON, N20 9AU
front and rear extensions plus roof alteration
- Authority
- London Borough of Barnet
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Thandi B
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of the occupiers of No 65 and No 69 with regard to outlook and privacy
- The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the host property and the area
What decided it
The proposed rear extension would be overly dominant, significantly large and disproportionate to the host property, unacceptably harming the character and appearance of the host property and the area contrary to development plan policies.
The personal benefit of additional living space for the family was outweighed by the unacceptable harm to character and appearance of the host property and area.
Plan policies cited: Policy CS5, Policy CS1, Policy DM01, Policy DM02
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.