Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 February 20223279727

283 Kingston Road, Leatherhead, KT22 7PJ

Planning appeal 3279727 at 283 Kingston Road, Leatherhead, KT22 7PJ (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 23 February 2022 by Inspector Miles H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

first floor extension and alterations to existing double garage to create one bedroom flat

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Miles H
Postcode
KT22 7PJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of existing occupiers with particular regard to 283 and 285 Kingston Road

What decided it

The adverse impacts of the schemes—harm to character and appearance, and harm to neighbouring living conditions through loss of outlook and sense of enclosure—significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited benefits of providing one dwelling, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.

The limited social and economic benefits of providing one dwelling in an accessible location were substantially outweighed by the notable harm to local character, design quality and neighbouring amenity, even accounting for the Council's shortfall in five-year housing land supply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS14Policy ENV22Policy ENV23Policy ENV32
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

142 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mole Valley District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed27 October 20266010634
    The Garden House, School Lane, Mickleham, Dorking, RH5 6EW
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266003694
    1 Ivy House Cottages, Partridge Lane, Newdigate, RH5 5BU
  3. Dismissed20 October 20266013764
    Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
  4. Dismissed19 October 20266011465
    Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
  5. Dismissed16 October 20266010203
    High Bank,, Mill Hill Lane, Betchworth, RH3 7LS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.