Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 December 20213279943

LAND SOUTH OF VIEW ROAD, CLIFFE WOODS, ROCHESTER, ME3 8JQ

approval of reserved matters of appearance, landscaping, layout and scale following outline planning permission Ref MC/16/3742 for the erection of 50 retirement homes comprising of 2/3 storey apartments and single storey bungalows with ancillary meeting room, gymnasium, office, parking and garaging

Authority
Medway Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Davies N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area (Appeals A and B)
  • The effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of future occupiers (Appeals A and B)
  • Whether suitable highway and motor scooter parking arrangements would be provided to serve the development (Appeals A and B)
  • Whether a suitable sustainable drainage arrangement incorporating biodiversity would be provided to serve the development (Appeals A and B)
  • The effect of the proposed development upon ecology within the site and at the adjacent Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and ancient woodland (Appeal B only)

What decided it

The proposals would create a visually harmful and unsympathetic settlement edge directly adjacent to countryside without successful transition from urban to rural, combined with unresolved deficiencies in drainage design and ecological mitigation.

Framework references: 167, 174, 180

Plan policies cited: Policy BNE1, Policy BNE2, Policy BNE6, Policy BNE35, Policy BNE39, Policy T1, Policy T22

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.