Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 January 20223279961

62 Brunswick Crescent, LONDON, N11 1EB

a roof extension involving rear dormer window

Authority
London Borough of Barnet
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
McHugh I

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the appeal property and the area
  • The effect on the living conditions of the occupants of neighbouring property, with particular regard to privacy

What decided it

The proposal's bulky and visually dominating appearance combined with the unacceptable privacy impact from the large roof-level windows rendered it unacceptable against the development plan and NPPF.

Framework references: 130

Plan policies cited: Policy CS1, Policy CS5, Policy DM01

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.