Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 February 20223279983

75 Tuck Road, Rainham, RM13 7HJ

Planning appeal 3279983 at 75 Tuck Road, Rainham, RM13 7HJ (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 16 February 2022 by Inspector Kemmann-Lane T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the streetscene.

addition of 1 x 1-bed attached dwelling involving conversion of existing attached garage, alteration to front elevation, part single, part two storey rear extension and first floor side extension over garage

Authority
London Borough of Havering
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Kemmann-Lane T
Postcode
RM13 7HJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the streetscene
  • the quality of the living conditions for future occupiers
  • the adequacy of car parking and cycle store, bins storage, etc

What decided it

The cumulative effect of harm to the neighbouring property's outlook, deficient living conditions for future occupiers, and inadequate parking and cycle storage arrangements outweighed the modest contribution to housing supply.

The presumption in favour of sustainable development arising from the borough's housing delivery shortfall was outweighed by the identified harms to neighbouring amenity, future occupier living conditions, and site layout deficiencies.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan Policy D6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

177 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed27 May 20266001193
    Archers Apartments, 27 Haysoms Close, Romford, Havering, RM1 4DL
  2. Dismissed21 May 20266004142
    1 Abbots Close, Havering, Rainham, Essex, RM13 9LA
  3. Dismissed21 May 20266003382
    Rear of 73 Front Lane, Upminster, RM14 1XL
  4. Allowed15 May 20266005087
    Land to the Rear of 55-67 Petersfield Avenue, Harold Hill, Romford, Havering, RM3 9PR
  5. Dismissed30 April 20266000610
    10 Parkland Avenue, Upminster, Upminster, RM14 2HA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.