Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 March 20223280125

68 Chigwell Road, London, E18 1NN

Planning appeal 3280125 at 68 Chigwell Road, London, E18 1NN (London Borough of Redbridge) was dismissed on 4 March 2022 by Inspector Bell-Williamson J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the ground floor flat provides adequate living conditions for its occupiers, with regard to outlook and privacy.

retrospective planning application for sub-division of flats to form ground floor flat and first floor maisonette

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Bell-Williamson J
Postcode
E18 1NN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the ground floor flat provides adequate living conditions for its occupiers, with regard to outlook and privacy
  • the effect of the residential use on parking
  • whether adequate amenity space is provided for the occupiers of the ground floor flat
  • whether the proposal makes adequate provision towards the mitigation of likely significant effects on the Epping Forest Special Area of Conservation (SAC)

What decided it

The failure to secure adequate provision for mitigation of likely significant effects on the Epping Forest Special Area of Conservation through a formal planning obligation meant the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply, and the conflicts with development plan policies on amenity space and European site protection could not be outweighed.

The benefits of providing additional housing were outweighed by the failure to secure mitigation for the Epping Forest SAC and the inadequacy of the amenity space provision in terms of quality and functionality.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D6 of The London Plan 2021Policy LP26 of the Redbridge Local Plan 2015-2030 (2018)Policy LP29 of the Redbridge Local Plan 2015-2030 (2018)Policy LP23 of the Redbridge Local Plan 2015-2030 (2018)Policy T6 of The London Plan 2021Policy LP39 of the Redbridge Local Plan 2015-2030 (2018)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 2Paragraph 11Paragraph 182

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

394 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Redbridge

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Notice varied and upheld23 September 20263353209
    3 Highbury Gardens, Ilford, IG3 8AB
  2. Dismissed21 May 20266004591
    18 Leyswood Drive, Newbury Park, Ilford, IG2 7JE
  3. Allowed6 May 20266005192
    38 Hertford Road, Ilford, IG2 7HF
  4. Dismissed28 April 20266004411
    178, The Drive, Cranbrook, Ilford, IG1 3PP
  5. Dismissed11 March 20266001175
    2 Hunter Road, Ilford, IG1 2NW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.