Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 June 20223280224

Chilton House Nedging Road, Nedging Tye, Ipswich, IP7 7HW

Planning appeal 3280224 at Chilton House Nedging Road, Nedging Tye, Ipswich, IP7 7HW (Babergh District Council) was dismissed on 16 June 2022 by Inspector Simpson L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The principle of development with particular regard to the accessibility of the site to services and facilities.

Erection of new dwelling and detached garage utilising existing access and shared driveway

Authority
Babergh District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Simpson L
Postcode
IP7 7HW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The principle of development with particular regard to the accessibility of the site to services and facilities
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposed development on highway safety
  • The effect on the setting of listed buildings
  • The effect of the proposed development on protected species

What decided it

The substantial harm to character and appearance, highway safety, and sustainability of location significantly and demonstrably outweighs the modest benefits of providing one dwelling when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

The substantial harm caused by poor access to services and facilities, significant disruption to linear character, and adverse highway safety impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighs the modest social, economic and environmental benefits of one energy-efficient dwelling.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Strategy Policy CS2Core Strategy Policy CS15Saved Local Plan Policy CN01Saved Local Plan Policy CN06
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 80Paragraph 92Paragraph 105Paragraph 111Paragraph 130
Judgments
Braintree District Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Greyread Limited & Granville Development Limited [2017]

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

5 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Babergh District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed7 October 20266011354
    Land at Junction of Friars Street and Church Street, Sudbury, CO10 2AJ
  2. Allowed16 September 20266013583
    57 Vale View Road, Sproughton, Ipswich, IP8 3FS
  3. Dismissed16 September 20266011384
    34 Aldham Road, Hadleigh, IP7 6BP
  4. Allowed7 August 20266007359
    Oaks Farm, Hadleigh Road, Holton St Mary, CO7 6NW
  5. Dismissed5 August 20266005638
    Land East of Capel Road, Bentley, IP9 2DN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.