Planning appeal decision
Oak Hill, Beggar Hill, Ingatestone, Essex, CM4 0PQ
side and rear extensions
- Authority
- Brentwood Borough Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Grierson E
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the revised National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
- The effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Fryerning Conservation Area
- Would the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The disproportionate size and scale of the proposed extensions relative to the original building, combined with the resulting moderate harm to the openness of the Green Belt, were not clearly outweighed by other considerations, meaning the very special circumstances required to justify Green Belt development did not exist.
Framework references: 149, 148
Plan policies cited: GB1, GB2, CP1, C14, C8
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®