Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 February 20223280503

94, Cannon Street, BURY ST EDMUNDS, Suffolk, IP33 1JU

retention of boundary fence

Authority
West Suffolk
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Pipe C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the Bury St Edmunds Town Centre Conservation Area

What decided it

The timber fence is materially incongruous with the conservation area's character and appearance, causes less than substantial harm to its significance, and is not justified by any public benefits.

Framework references: 199, 200, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy CS3 of the Forest Heath Local Development Framework, Core Strategy Development Plan Documents 2001-2026, Policy DM2 of the Forest Heath and St Edmundsbury Local Plan, Joint Development Management Policies Document (2015), Policy DM17 of the Forest Heath and St Edmundsbury Local Plan, Joint Development Management Policies Document (2015)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.