Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 March 20223280587

1a Ravenscourt Road, London, W6 0UH

Planning appeal 3280587 at 1a Ravenscourt Road, London, W6 0UH (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 16 March 2022 by Inspector O'Connor H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties having particular regard to outlook and the impact on sunlight to amenity spaces.

the ‘Demolition of the existing single storey office building, erection of a replacement part 1 and part two storey office building (Class B1); alterations to the front boundary treatment and installation of new gates to the front boundary wall; associated car and cycle parking

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Minor offices/R&D/light industry
Inspector
O'Connor H
Postcode
W6 0UH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties having particular regard to outlook and the impact on sunlight to amenity spaces
  • The character and appearance of the area having particular regard to the significance of the Ravenscourt and Starch Green Conservation Area and locally listed Buildings of Merit

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through the confining effect on outlook, which conflicts with development plan policies requiring respect for good neighbourliness and residential amenity principles.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DC1DC2DC8HO11D4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130Paragraph 197Paragraph 203

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

771 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed27 October 20266010878
    47, Mendora Road, London, SW6 7ND
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266010445
    Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
  3. Dismissed1 October 20266010443
    Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
  4. Allowed23 September 20266010549
    The Triangle, 5 - 17 Hammersmith Grove, London, W6 0LG
  5. Unknown18 September 20263356900
    Unit 1D, Woodstock Studios, 36 Woodstock Grove, London, W12 8LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.