Planning appeal decision
Almond Villa, Southport Road, Scarisbrick, Lancashire, L40 9RE
single storey side extensions on the west and east elevations
- Authority
- West Lancashire District Council
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Moore D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the land on which the proposed single storey side extensions would be sited falls within the curtilage of the dwellinghouse and thus would constitute permitted development under the GPDO
What decided it
The land on which the extensions would be sited forms part and parcel with the bungalow, is intimately associated with it, and serves the residential purpose in a reasonably useful way, and therefore falls within the curtilage of the dwellinghouse.
Judgments cited: Methuen-Campbell v Walters [1979] 1 QB 525; Dyer v Dorset CC [1988] 3 WLR 213; McAlpine v SSE [1995] 159 L.G. Rev. 429; R (oao Sumption) v Greenwich LBC [2007] EWHC 2276 (Admin); Sinclair-Lockhart's Trustees v Central Land Board [1950] 1 P&CR 195; Skerritts of Nottingham Ltd v SSETR (No. 1) [2000] EWCA Civ 60; Lowe v First Secretary of State [2003] EWHC 537 (Admin); Burford v SSCLG [2017] J.P.L. 1300; Attorney-General ex rel. Sutcliffe and Others v Calderdale Borough Council [1983] 46 P&CR 399
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®