Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed22 December 20213280590

Almond Villa, Southport Road, Scarisbrick, Lancashire, L40 9RE

single storey side extensions on the west and east elevations

Authority
West Lancashire District Council
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Moore D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the land on which the proposed single storey side extensions would be sited falls within the curtilage of the dwellinghouse and thus would constitute permitted development under the GPDO

What decided it

The land on which the extensions would be sited forms part and parcel with the bungalow, is intimately associated with it, and serves the residential purpose in a reasonably useful way, and therefore falls within the curtilage of the dwellinghouse.

Judgments cited: Methuen-Campbell v Walters [1979] 1 QB 525; Dyer v Dorset CC [1988] 3 WLR 213; McAlpine v SSE [1995] 159 L.G. Rev. 429; R (oao Sumption) v Greenwich LBC [2007] EWHC 2276 (Admin); Sinclair-Lockhart's Trustees v Central Land Board [1950] 1 P&CR 195; Skerritts of Nottingham Ltd v SSETR (No. 1) [2000] EWCA Civ 60; Lowe v First Secretary of State [2003] EWHC 537 (Admin); Burford v SSCLG [2017] J.P.L. 1300; Attorney-General ex rel. Sutcliffe and Others v Calderdale Borough Council [1983] 46 P&CR 399

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.