Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed23 February 20223280836

Hotham House, Ground Floor, 1 Heron Square, Richmond, TW9 1EJ

Planning appeal 3280836 at Hotham House, Ground Floor, 1 Heron Square, Richmond, TW9 1EJ (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was allowed on 23 February 2022 by Inspector Tucker A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development on Metropolitan Open Land (MOL) having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

new hard surfacing to facilitate creation of external customer seating area and replacement waiter station

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Tucker A
Postcode
TW9 1EJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development on Metropolitan Open Land (MOL) having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the existing building and the area, including the Richmond Riverside Conservation Area and the setting of the listed building known as Heron House

What decided it

The proposal's modest scale as an extension to the existing building, combined with its low-level linear arrangement that would not harm the character of the conservation area or the setting of the listed building, meant it would not be inappropriate development on Metropolitan Open Land and would preserve heritage assets.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP13Policy G3Policy LP1Policy LP3Policy LP4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 138Paragraph 149Paragraph 199

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

445 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266015879
    88 Colne Road, Twickenham, TW2 6QE
  2. Dismissed28 October 20266015836
    64 First Avenue, Mortlake, London, SW14 8SR
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266011874
    61-63 Petersham Road, Richmond Upon Thames, TW10 6UT
  4. Dismissed20 October 20266010388
    163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
  5. Dismissed19 October 20266013760
    Pavement Os, 53-57 High Street, Whitton, TW2 7LB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.