Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 January 20223280985

95 Pye Corner, Gilston, HARLOW, CM20 2RD

first floor rear extension with associated elevational alterations (Resubmission)

Authority
East Hertfordshire District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Miles H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposed extension would result in disproportionate additions relative to the original building, constituting inappropriate development in the Green Belt that cannot be justified by very special circumstances.

Framework references: 148, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy GBR1, Policy HOU11, Policy DES4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.