Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 February 20223281062

Spring Cottage Stoke Wood, Stoke Poges, SLOUGH, SL2 4AU

construction of two detached dwellings

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area *
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Page L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies and any effects on openness
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, or any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would harm openness, and the limited housing and socio-economic benefits would not clearly outweigh this substantial harm to justify very special circumstances.

the limited benefits of additional housing and socio-economic activity did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and effects on openness

Framework references: 11, 69, 147, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy GB1, Policy GB3

Judgments cited: Julian Wood v SSCLG, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195; R (Lee Valley Regional Park Authority) v Broxbourne BC [2015] EWHC 185 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.