Planning appeal decision
Spring Cottage Stoke Wood, Stoke Poges, SLOUGH, SL2 4AU
construction of two detached dwellings
- Authority
- Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area *
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Page L
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies and any effects on openness
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, or any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would harm openness, and the limited housing and socio-economic benefits would not clearly outweigh this substantial harm to justify very special circumstances.
the limited benefits of additional housing and socio-economic activity did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and effects on openness
Framework references: 11, 69, 147, 148, 149
Plan policies cited: Policy GB1, Policy GB3
Judgments cited: Julian Wood v SSCLG, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195; R (Lee Valley Regional Park Authority) v Broxbourne BC [2015] EWHC 185 (Admin)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®