Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 November 20213281126

Perspolis House, Robinwood Grove, Uxbridge, UB8 3TW

Planning appeal 3281126 at Perspolis House, Robinwood Grove, Uxbridge, UB8 3TW (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 1 November 2021 by Inspector Cullen F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

changing the existing roof and the loft floor

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Cullen F
Postcode
UB8 3TW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building and the area, having particular regard to its location within the Hillingdon Village Conservation Area
  • If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposed development

What decided it

The substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriate development and the considerable harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area were not clearly outweighed by the limited public benefits, and no very special circumstances existed to justify the proposal.

The substantial weight given to Green Belt harm (inappropriateness and loss of openness) and the considerable weight given to heritage harm to the conservation area were not outweighed by the modest economic benefits and private accommodation gains, resulting in dismissal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EM2 of the London Borough of Hillingdon Local Plan: Part One - Strategic Policies, 2012Policy DMEI 4 of the London Borough of Hillingdon Local Plan: Part Two – Development Management Policies, 2020Policy G2 of the London Plan 2021Policy BE1 of the London Borough of Hillingdon Local Plan: Part One - Strategic Policies, 2012Policy HE1 of the London Borough of Hillingdon Local Plan: Part One - Strategic Policies, 2012Policy DMHB 1 of the London Borough of Hillingdon Local Plan: Part Two – Development Management Policies, 2020Policy DMHB 4 of the London Borough of Hillingdon Local Plan: Part Two – Development Management Policies, 2020Policy DMHB 11 of the London Borough of Hillingdon Local Plan: Part Two – Development Management Policies, 2020Policy DMHB 12 of the London Borough of Hillingdon Local Plan: Part Two – Development Management Policies, 2020Policy DMHD 1 of the London Borough of Hillingdon Local Plan: Part Two – Development Management Policies, 2020Policy HC1 of the London Plan 2021
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 149

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

380 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed15 September 20266010520
    Grove Farm, Rickmansworth Road, Harefield, UB9 6JY
  2. Notice varied and upheld29 July 20253363007
    Land on the West Side of High Street, Harlington, Hayes, UB3 5DW
  3. Dismissed20 June 20253355798
    Khayri House, 70 Clifton Gardens, Uxbridge, Hillingdon, UB10 0EZ
  4. Allowed21 February 20253341154
    Chandigrah Summerhouse Lane, Harefield, Uxbridge, UB9 6HS
  5. Dismissed1 November 20243345366
    Grass Verge Adjacent To 19 Rutters Close, West Drayton, UB7 9AL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.