Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 March 20223281150

Wycoombe, Hockenden Lane, Swanley, Kent, BR8 7QH

Planning appeal 3281150 at Wycoombe, Hockenden Lane, Swanley, Kent, BR8 7QH (London Borough of Bromley) was dismissed on 25 March 2022 by Inspector Glassar S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

the demolition of existing buildings and erection of detached equestrian barn formation of new access to barn

Authority
London Borough of Bromley
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Other minor developments
Inspector
Glassar S
Postcode
BR8 7QH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Would harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations. If so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposed building would cause a significant loss of openness of the Green Belt and would not fall within the exceptions in NPPF paragraph 149, making it inappropriate development that cannot be justified by the limited other considerations advanced.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 49Policy 37Policy 61
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 145Paragraph 148Paragraph 149

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

70 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Bromley

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Split Decision5 August 20263378375
    Land Adjoining and to the West of Jodeen Animal Sanctuary, Sevenoaks Road, Halstead, Kent, TN14 7HR
  2. Dismissed30 April 20266005662
    336 Main Road, Biggin Hill, Westerham, Kent, TN16 2HL
  3. Allowed17 April 20266000833
    Land Between 127 & 129 Leaves Green Road, Keston, BR2 6DG
  4. Notice varied and upheld31 March 20263343405
    Land to the Rear of 50 to 54 Cudham Lane, Cudham, TN14 7QY
  5. Dismissed18 March 20263375346
    Downe Court, Cudham Road, Downe, Orpington, Bromley, BR6 7LF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.