Planning appeal decision
Petersbourne Court, Petersfield Road, Birmingham, B28 0AS
described on the application form as ‘change of use and extend (residential)
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Ollerenshaw M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development proposed on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of Petersbourne Court, a non-designated heritage asset
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of residents of Petersbourne Court in relation to external amenity space
- Whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers of the proposed development, having regard to privacy, external amenity space and internal space
- The effect of the proposal on nearby trees
- The effect of the proposal on the highway and pedestrian safety, having regard to parking provision
What decided it
The harmful effect on the character and appearance of the area and the setting of the non-designated heritage asset, combined with inadequate living conditions for both existing and future occupiers, outweighed the limited benefits of the proposal.
Framework references: 203
Plan policies cited: PG3, TP12, TP27, TP30, TP7, TP38, TP44, DM10, DM14, DM2
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®