Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 April 20223281188

Petersbourne Court, Petersfield Road, Birmingham, B28 0AS

described on the application form as ‘change of use and extend (residential)

Authority
Birmingham City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Ollerenshaw M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development proposed on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of Petersbourne Court, a non-designated heritage asset
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of residents of Petersbourne Court in relation to external amenity space
  • Whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers of the proposed development, having regard to privacy, external amenity space and internal space
  • The effect of the proposal on nearby trees
  • The effect of the proposal on the highway and pedestrian safety, having regard to parking provision

What decided it

The harmful effect on the character and appearance of the area and the setting of the non-designated heritage asset, combined with inadequate living conditions for both existing and future occupiers, outweighed the limited benefits of the proposal.

Framework references: 203

Plan policies cited: PG3, TP12, TP27, TP30, TP7, TP38, TP44, DM10, DM14, DM2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.