Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 March 20223281310

41 Eastfields Road, Mitcham, CR4 2LS

Planning appeal 3281310 at 41 Eastfields Road, Mitcham, CR4 2LS (London Borough of Merton) was dismissed on 15 March 2022 by Inspector Marshall E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the impact of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area.

demolition of existing detached building and erection of new part 2-storey/part 3-storey detached building with roof accommodation consisting of 8 self-contained flats (1 x 3 bed, 5 x 2-bed, 2 x 1-bed) all with private outdoor amenity space and associated secure and covered cycle and refuse storage

Authority
London Borough of Merton
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Marshall E
Postcode
CR4 2LS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the impact of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with regard to loss of privacy, overbearingness and unneighbourly development
  • whether the proposal can provide suitable cycle storage

What decided it

The proposal represents excessive overdevelopment causing significant harm to the character and appearance of the area and unacceptable overbearing impact on neighbouring residential amenity, which substantially outweighs the moderate benefit of seven additional housing units.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Sites and Policies Plan 2014 Policy DM D1Sites and Policies Plan 2014 Policy DM D2Core Strategy 2011 PolicyLondon Plan 2021 Policy D3London Plan 2021 Policy D4London Plan 2021 Policy T5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 125Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

246 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Merton

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed23 October 20266006717
    71 Leamington Avenue, Morden, SM4 4DQ
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266008957
    18, West Place, London, SW19 4UH
  3. Notice upheld21 September 20263364443
    31 Glebe Avenue, Mitcham, CR4 3DZ
  4. Allowed7 August 20266007543
    11B Calonne Road, Merton, Wimbledon, SW19 8HH
  5. Dismissed17 July 20266006955
    35 Kingston Road, London, SW19 1JW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.