Brede Valley Farm, Frymans Lane, Brede, Rye, East Sussex, TN31 6HA

Planning appeal 3281371 at Brede Valley Farm, Frymans Lane, Brede, Rye, East Sussex, TN31 6HA (Rother District Council) was dismissed on 14 November 2022 by Inspector Wilson L, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether there is an essential need for a dwelling to accommodate a rural worker, having regard to the financial soundness of the enterprise.

the erection of agricultural dwelling

Authority: Rother District Council
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Hearing
Development: agricultural · Other minor developments
Inspector: Wilson L
Postcode: TN31 6HA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

Whether there is an essential need for a dwelling to accommodate a rural worker, having regard to the financial soundness of the enterprise
The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, having regard to the landscape and scenic beauty and dark night sky of the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)

What decided it

The enterprise's financial variability meant there was no clear prospect of it remaining financially sound, so an essential need for a rural worker's dwelling was not established, and this combined with harm to the AONB led to dismissal.

The other matters raised and benefits of the proposal did not outweigh the harm identified in relation to essential need and to the character, appearance and dark night sky of the AONB.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy RA3Policy OSS3Policy OSS4Policy RA2Policy EN1Policy DEN1Policy DEN2
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 80Paragraph 174Paragraph 176Paragraph 185
Judgments: Jarmain v SSETR & Welwyn Hatfield DC [2000] EWCA Civ 126; [2000] JPL 1063

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

7 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Rother District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

Dismissed22 October 20266015532
65 Westfield Lane, St Leonards on Sea, TN37 7NF
Dismissed14 October 20266007775
Land Adjacent to Broadlawns, Whitebread Lane, Beckley, TN31 6TY
Dismissed12 October 20266010105
Upper Morgay Wood, Junction Road, Staplecross, TN32 5SH
Dismissed22 September 20266008634
Barn House, Warren Road, Fairlight, TN35 4AN
Allowed21 September 20266009677
Black Cottage, Henley Down, Catsfield, TN33 9BN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.