Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed28 January 20223282035

Austin House, 39 St. Mark's Hill, Surbiton, KT6 4LT

Planning appeal 3282035 at Austin House, 39 St. Mark's Hill, Surbiton, KT6 4LT (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was allowed on 28 January 2022 by Inspector McCreery D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether prior approval should be granted for the proposed development when regard is paid to the requirements of Part 20, Class AA paragraph AA.2(1)(e) relating to the external appearance of the building.

construction of two additional storeys of new dwellinghouses above Austin House, St Marks Hill, Surbiton, KT6 4LT to provide 12no.x new dwellings (2no. x1 bed 1person units, 8no. x1 bed 2 person units and 2no. x 2 bed 4 person units), with works for the construction of appropriate and safe access to and egress from the new dwellinghouses and works for the construction of storage facilities reasonably necessary to support the new dwellinghouses

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
McCreery D
Postcode
KT6 4LT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether prior approval should be granted for the proposed development when regard is paid to the requirements of Part 20, Class AA paragraph AA.2(1)(e) relating to the external appearance of the building

What decided it

The proposal would have acceptable effects on the external appearance of the building and would not sever an important part of its relationship with the surrounding context, therefore prior approval should be granted.

What the Inspector cited

National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 57

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

365 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed7 October 20266011912
    11 Kingsdowne Road, Surbiton, KT6 6JZ
  2. Dismissed29 September 20266009988
    56 Burlington Road, New Malden, KT3 4NU
  3. Dismissed25 September 20266009076
    74 - 76 Coombe Road, New Malden, KT3 4QU
  4. Allowed11 August 20266010924
    271 Malden Road, New Malden, KT3 6AH
  5. Dismissed3 August 20266007703
    Town End Pier, 68 High Street, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 1HN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.